Bittensor's Decentralization Claims Under Fire as Major Developer Exodus Triggers 18% TAO Selloff
Covenant AI's departure from Bittensor exposes a critical vulnerability in one of crypto's hottest narratives: whether decentralized AI networks can actually deliver on their governance promises. The subnet developer's exit Friday sent TAO tumbling 18% in 24 hours, with sell volume hitting its high

Covenant AI's departure from Bittensor exposes a critical vulnerability in one of crypto's hottest narratives: whether decentralized AI networks can actually deliver on their governance promises. The subnet developer's exit Friday sent TAO tumbling 18% in 24 hours, with sell volume hitting its highest level since December 2024—timing that raises serious questions about whether insiders knew this was coming.
The Governance Crisis at Bittensor's Core
Sam Dare, founder of Covenant AI, pulled no punches in his departure announcement. The team is abandoning Bittensor over what Dare calls "decentralization theatre"—a network structure that claims to be distributed but operates under concentrated control. His specific accusation: founder Jacob Steeves (known as Const) maintains effective dominance over governance through a "Triumvirate" of Opentensor Foundation employees who hold root permissions, resisting any meaningful authority transfer.
Bittensor's governance framework officially describes this as a "transitional system" where the Triumvirate sits alongside a senate. In practice, Dare argues, this creates the illusion of decentralization while preserving unilateral decision-making power for leadership.
Actions Taken, Allegations Denied
Covenant AI claims Steeves took several hostile moves against their subnet in recent weeks: suspending emissions, restricting moderation powers in community channels, and timing visible token sales to apply "direct economic pressure" during the dispute.
Steeves flatly denied the allegations. He stated he cannot suspend subnet emissions and holds no special privileges beyond what any TAO token holder possesses. Regarding the token sales, Steeves explained he sold holdings from three subnets that "were not running and were on near 100% burn code"—a move that affects emissions the same way any buy or sell does on-chain. He also clarified he only temporarily removed Covenant AI's post-deletion rights before restoring them.
"Less than 1% of what i had invested in his teams," Steeves wrote. "Visibility is impossible to avoid in my position. I reserve my right to buy and sell tokens which is what underpins the entire system of dTao."
Market Intel Suggests Coordinated Execution
The crypto analysis community is reading this situation through a different lens. Ardi, a noted crypto analyst, pointed out that TAO's sell volume spiked dramatically roughly 24 hours before Covenant AI announced its departure. "If you think that's a coincidence, you don't understand the game you're playing. This was a calculated exit and execution," Ardi posted Friday.
Alpha Take
Bittensor faces a critical credibility test. The TAO governance structure now sits under microscope: either Steeves demonstrates meaningful distribution of control with verifiable checks and balances, or the network risks becoming known as another "decentralization theatre" project. For traders, watch whether other subnet developers exit—a second major departure would confirm this is systemic, not isolated. The pre-spike in sell volume also suggests institutional smart money already made its decision.
Originally reported by
CoinTelegraph
Not financial advice. Crypto investing involves significant risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.