Layer-1 Blockchains Show Rising Adoption Despite Token Collapse—Here's What's Driving It
The disconnect between network fundamentals and price action is glaring right now. While Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche have all tanked more than 50% over the past year, transaction activity on these chains is actually accelerating and fees are dropping—a dynamic that Bitwise recently highlighted

The disconnect between network fundamentals and price action is glaring right now. While Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche have all tanked more than 50% over the past year, transaction activity on these chains is actually accelerating and fees are dropping—a dynamic that Bitwise recently highlighted in their latest analysis.
This tells us something important: these networks are becoming more useful even as their tokens trade lower. That's the opposite of what you'd typically expect in a bear market.
Activity Up, Prices Down
According to Bitwise's data, all three major Layer-1 chains have processed more transactions and attracted more users despite the brutal token performance. ETH, SOL, and AVAX are all trading down over 50% year-over-year, yet the networks themselves are getting busier.
This isn't accidental. Competition on the Layer-1 front has intensified significantly. Solana has been aggressively marketing its speed and low fees. Avalanche has focused on developer incentives and ecosystem growth. Meanwhile, Ethereum, despite higher gas costs during peak usage, continues to benefit from its network effects and DeFi dominance.
The result? More transactions, lower friction, and better user experience across the board—precisely what you want to see in a maturing crypto infrastructure play.
Fee Compression Is Real
Here's where it gets interesting for traders: fees on these networks are dropping. Bitwise's analysis shows transaction costs declining across ETH, SOL, and AVAX, even as activity increases.
Lower fees typically signal healthy competition and technological improvements. For users, it's a win. For token holders gambling on network value accrual, it's a reminder that L1 tokens are increasingly competing on utility rather than scarcity.
This is particularly noteworthy for Ethereum, where gas fees have historically been a pain point. The fact that fee competition is working—and users are voting with their feet by choosing cheaper options—suggests the market is forcing efficiency improvements across the entire sector.
The Revenue Problem
Here's the catch: while transaction volumes increased and fees decreased, network revenues actually fell. This is the trader's reality check.
Lower fees mean lower earnings for validators and node operators. For Ethereum stakers, SOL validators, and AVAX node runners, the economics are tightening. This could eventually pressure staking yields, which in turn affects the fundamental appeal of holding these tokens for income purposes.
Bitwise's data reinforces an uncomfortable truth: you can have a "better" network by most metrics and still see your token underperform. Network growth doesn't automatically translate to token appreciation—at least not in the short term.
Alpha Take
The story here isn't that these networks are broken—it's that they're becoming commoditized. Rising activity with falling fees and revenues suggests we're moving from a "blockchain wars" paradigm where any adoption was bullish, to a mature infrastructure model where efficiency matters more than hype. For your portfolio, this means evaluating L1 tokens on staking yields, tokenomics, and real economic moats—not just transaction growth. Watch for validator economics and fee structures to become key trading drivers going forward.
Originally reported by
The Block
Not financial advice. Crypto investing involves significant risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.